The annotated bibliography presented has different points of views and counter arguments regarding the moral argument. The argument from morality presents ideas about the existence of God and has a basis on moral order. Summary The essay attempts to explain that there exist some passages in Kierkegaard work for an argument for the existence of God and immortality similar to Kant鈥檚 moral argument for the existence of God and immortality. Kierkegaard aligns his arguments with Kant鈥檚 moral argument in the form and content as well as use of some terminology. He uses the moral argument to explain the existence of God and immortality. He argues that the moral argument for the existence of God and immortality helps to address the problem of the highest good. He argues that events that occur in the world are phenomena Manny Machado Youth Jersey , not noumena. Thus, the highest good is impossible if the phenomenal world is as it is. The highest good is possible by the assumption that human beings have noumenal will acting on the phenomenal world. Kierkegaard relies on a reductio ad absurdum practicum argument that attempts to explain that an individual who denies its conclusion violates a duty. The major issue about the article is the premise that events in the world are phenomena meaning that they are difficult to understand and likely caused by another being other than humans. Application I intend to use the source in the paper to explain the existence of God basing the arguments on the nature of occurrence of different events in the world as being phenomena and on the highest good. I find the article useful for use in the research due to its attempts to expound on the moral argument basing the arguments on the issues that one can identify with. The article teaches that the role of God is to make the highest good possible even though it appears impossible. Citation Fremstedal Wil Myers Youth Jersey , Roe. "The Moral Argument For The Existence Of God And Immortality The Moral Argument For The Existence Of God And Immortality: Kierkegaard And Kant." Journal Of Religious Ethics 41.1 (2013): 50-78. Academic Search Premier. Retrieved on 29 Mar. 2016 Summary The article regards an argument about morality and the three-fold existence of God. The author attempts to outline some arguments to address the argument about the existence of God who is infinite and perfect. He uses the plea of moral necessity and base the argument on Kant鈥檚 ideas that it is certain that something ought to exist. Kant claims that the arguments for the existence of God are not inferior to any knowledge. Thus, the author explains the need for focusing on the structure of non-ethical arguments for the existence of God. The article uses examples and quotes to form the basis of the arguments. The issue that sticks out to me from the article is that the moral argument creates conflicts of ideas since to have an infinite and perfect being Rollie Fingers Youth Jersey , it requires him to be present in the physical world as well as the orders of the intellect and morality. Application I intend to use the paper to provide a discussion about the existence of an infinite and perfect being whose location in the various orders of the intellect and morality is problematic without having conflicts of ideas. However, the arguments are necessary to provide some light on the matter. I find the article interesting since it postulates of the existence of a being that is infinite and perfect that must appear in all the orders and dimensions of reality which I find to be a challenge. I learnt that Dave Winfield Youth Jersey , it is not possible to have a clear explanation for the existence of God unless with a pure practical reason. Citation Armour, Leslie. "Morality And The Three-Fold Existence Of God." Forum Philosophicum: International Journal For Philosophy 17.1 (2012): 27-47. Academic Search Premier. Retrieved on 29 Mar. 2016 Summary The article presents some comments in response to an article by David Baggett about apologetic moral argument as postulated by C.S Lewis. According to the author Tony Gwynn Youth Jersey , the article grapples with the relationship between God and the moral law in various writings. According to the reference article by Lewis, conscience reveals to humans a moral law whose source is not found in the natural world. Thus Trevor Hoffman Womens Jersey , he postulates of the existence of a supernatural lawgiver. However, the author of the present article claims that there are serious challenges of consideration to Lewin鈥檚 moral argument. The article uses quotes from another work as composed by C.S Lewis to expound on his critique of the moral argument. The major issue with the article is the ideas presented about the struggle of the relationship between God and the moral law in which He ought to be the cause of morality in the world.
Application I intend to use the article to highlight on Lewis鈥?ideas about the existence of God as a moral law but also incorporate the author鈥檚 ideas about the challenges of using the argument as valid. I find the article useful for use in the research since it offers digressing ideas about the moral argument to form a basis of the discussion focusing on both sides of the ideas. I learnt that not every argument about the existence of God is valid unless it has practical reasons that every researcher can identify. The explanation of the existence of God on the basis of the conscience appears valid Randy Jones Womens Jersey , but still the author identifies serious challenges to it. Citation Wielenberg, Erik J. "Con: A Critique Of The Moral Argument." Value Inquiry Book Series 286.(2015): 141-151. Academic Search Premier. Retrieved on 29 Mar. 2016 Summary The article provides a discussion of the effect of the belief that heaven exists on the philosophical arguments for God鈥檚 existence. Many researchers agree that the belief in the existence of heaven remains to be the most popular solution to the prob An office is a p. Wholesale Air Jordan